Thursday, January 27, 2011

It's a Me Thing #3: I Like it Both Ways.

It is, at long last, my final semester as an undergraduate. I have completed all the specific requirements necessary for my B.A. (in English!) and I am now merely filling my few remaining credit hours in a couple of interesting electives: Publishing 372 and Gender Studies 300. Both of them (although perhaps Publishing, at first glance, might not appear so) are particularly interesting: the former has discussed, at least so far, the details of the editing and publishing process (something particularly interesting to a hopeful author like myself) while the latter is centred on the apparent "crisis of masculinity", throwing around terms like "metrosexual" and "ultramasculine" in classroom discussion as rapidly and easily as "Tuesday" and "coffee break".

This gender studies class is actually, for the first time in recent memory, so based in interesting discourse that I find myself sitting back and paying thorough attention at all times (even when I don't need to take notes!). The crux of the debate is this: there is a dichotomy and a disparity between the "traditional" or "stereotypical" male and the "modern" or "feminist" man, and this shift/discourse/increased awareness is creating what many deem a "crisis" -- i.e., our typical notions of what and who is truly "male" are changing rapidly.

What I have found the most engaging part of the debate -- and which, perhaps ironically, also irks me the most -- is this juxtaposition of the "good" and "feminized" man against the "bad" and "masculinized" one. The former is emotionally available, sentimental, gentle-natured, well-dressed, socially aware, and politically correct; the latter, a plaid-and-denim-wearing, beard-growing, beer-drinking, fart-and-fart-joke-making chauvinist who comes home to a hot meal, a devoted spouse, and a UFC pay-per-view match on TV. The "good" man is romantic, has no problem with his wife playing breadwinner, and opposes the traditional nuclear family (the "good" man loves babies and has no issue with a good ol' diaper change). The "bad"? He nary washes a dish, stirs a pot, or folds a single pair of boxers; his hair is close-cropped, and his work boots are irreparably stained with caulking paste and testosterone. One, the debate espouses, simply cannot equal the other; the "good" and the "bad" are to be forever at odds. And yet, here I ask, why? Why can't they interact? Like yin and yang, what's wrong with a little bit of both? And really, at the base of it, what's so wrong with a man's man anyways?

This is supposed to be good.

And this? Big man, real bad. REAL bad.


Perhaps I am the minority -- in my gender studies class, I certainly must be -- but I've always been partial... nay, inclined... to the more rugged specimens of the opposite sex. Boyfriend, in fact, is a perfect example: bias aside (okay, maybe not entirely), he has broad shoulders, an imposing stature, and a consistent 5 o'clock shadow spread across a jawline so sharp and square that I could use it to cut tempered steel. Before meeting him, I asked a girlfriend of mine if he was a good prospect for me and she described him thus: "Well, if you're into that square-jawed, full-lipped, broad-shouldered, tall, muscular, stereotypically good-looking type... then yes. You know, if that's your thing."

Uh, no. That didn't sound appealing to me in the slightest.

ZOMG WIN!!!!11!!1 LOL ROFLCOPTER


My girlfriend, of course, was herself partial to the effeminate, full-lashed, ectomorphic artist type -- the kind that sipped juniper tea, wore fringed scarves and skinny jeans, and was summarily described as "man-pretty" -- the doe-eyed Pattinson type, if you will, which explained her ill-concealed aversion to my own brand of sexy. I, however, being of the sort that doesn't like a better half that can share my jean collection, was more than happy to meet (then soon-to-be) boyfriend, and have been pleased with my selection since then. (Ya did good, kid.)

It's not just his looks, though: boyfriend is a GUY. Like, a total DUDE. I regularly say to some comment or action of his, "You are such a boy sometimes!" to which he casually and matter-of-factly replies, "Well, yeah. I know. ...sorry." 90% of the time, our TV is tuned to football or hockey games; he likes bacon (on almost everything), and has quite the affinity for a good brew. He works construction in the summer; he played football in university; he rarely cooks, and I don't think he's folded a piece of laundry in his adult life. He swears, he burps, he power-lifts; he's desperate for a big, thundering motorcycle and in the meantime he drives a Mustang. He's a man, in both good ways and bad: he hates putting away clean dishes from the dishwasher (the process is usually accompanied by a series of Homer-Simpson-like groaning); he built our bed-frame himself, but hates tucking in the sheets on the mattress. Boyfriend is not what one would consider to be "short of testosterone"... and yet, he's also a very sweet guy, and I don't think he generally gets enough credit for it.

When I'm having a horrible day (or even a wonderful one), he is never short of bear hugs and heaps of feel-better kisses. He holds my hand in public -- or on the sofa, or in bed, or across the stick shift when he's driving -- and he tells me he loves me daily (in fact, multiple times a day). Multiple times as well, I have come home from an awful day or a harrowing week to find a bouquet of flowers, vase-d and watered, sitting on the table, or a box of fresh sushi on the kitchen counter because he knows I'm too exhausted to cook. He does the dishes for me when I make dinner; he buys me teddy bears every once and a while when he goes on trips; and he's actually quite talented (for a guy) at expressing his frustrations (just don't tell him I told you, or he'll kill me). And, perhaps most telling of all, boyfriend is going to be a teacher, a stereotypically female-dominated profession in which he will need to both teach relevant material an engage productively with a wide variety of students. Boyfriend has, as far as I'm concerned, successfully planted a foot in both worlds, and I am very proud of him for doing so.

I did good? Oh, yeah. I definitely did good.
Long story short, I think boyfriend maintains a pretty good balance. That's not to say he doesn't have his pitfalls, of course -- but then again, whether I attribute those flaws to his personality or his masculinity, it is occasionally hard to tell. Purposely annoying me to entertain himself, such as by flicking my nose or tickling the sides of my feet? Probably just good-old-boyfriend-ness. Leaving piles of clean laundry in conspicuous lumps in front of my closet so he doesn't have to fold them himself? I'll chalk that one up to boyhood. Picking his nose and flicking the boogers on the carpet? A healthy mixture of both, I think. (Really, only a true man could be that gross).

For the most part, though, I think boyfriend maintains a good balance, somewhere between this type of guy and this other sort of specimen. He's a manly man when he needs to be, but he's far from misogynistic, and if you know him well enough you can easily tell that he's a good guy through and through.

Although, his loofah is shaped like a tire... eh. We'll leave that one to the psychologists.


Thursday, January 13, 2011

Things that Suck # 3: People Cannot Spell.

Contrary to popular belief, I generally do not consider myself a grammar nazi. I don't correct the speech patterns of strangers, and I rarely do so for my friends; I don't get insanely upset when people type "u" instead of "you" when they send me a text (although "wut" and "lyk" absolutely make me ill); I don't obsess over casual capitalization (in fact, on Facebook I tend to avoid it altogether -- it just makes me feel better when I see all the other pseudo-conversations going on); and I never joke or tease when boyfriend asks me to spell a word for him (the English language is difficult, and I get that). Even when foibles and faux pas do frustrate me to no end, I usually just put on a brave face and stew on it quietly while the rest of the conversation continues.
There "were" a bunch of cars in the ditch. Not there "was", there "were". ...imbeciles. 


Sometimes, though, a person just can't help getting frustrated. I mean, when your English professor -- your 400-level English professor -- sends you an email telling you that "your going to have to send me those dates again", you can't help but grind your teeth. And when you open your new novel for your winter gender studies course -- a novel, might I add, that won awards from the American Library Association  -- and it mentions "changing the breaks in the car", you (okay, I) want to fling the book down in frustration, as I'll never be able to enjoy it properly with that mishap flashing like a police light in the back of my eyes as I read.

Spelling and grammar drive me absolutely nuts sometimes. Comma splices? Like papercuts. The "were are we going today" thing? Stubbing your toe on a sharp corner. And the your/you're conundrum? Warm liquor, on a hot day, with a mild flu, next to a garbage dump, with a horde of mosquitos aiming Kamikaze missions at your ears. Oh, and you have blisters. Lots and lots of giant, angry blisters.
I'm not coming out until they're gone. Or have surgically attached Webster's Dictionary to their bottom lips. Whichever comes first.
People: let me tell you this now, for your own good. Yes, I notice when you make mistakes. No, for the most part, I don't judge. However -- and I mean this with the greatest of emphasis -- when you make a career out of your English knowledge (as a novelist, for example, or a professor) then I expect you to know how to form your words properly. In fact, on that note, what the hell are the editors doing? I was copy editing in seventh grade, people. Seventh grade. And even then, I was far beyond making the there/their mistake that seems to pepper my messages like buckshot every time I open them.

And no, purposely misspelling words to sound funny makes you neither cute nor funny. Ever seen Deliverance? You know that guy that starts hopping around spastically while the banjos are duelling? You see how everyone else is laughing? Well, in the movie, they're laughing with him. In real life, I'd be laughing at you. Oh, sorry, I misspelt that. I meant to say "throwing rocks". I would be "throwing rocks at you", as you sent me this asinine crap, in an attempt to knock the tar out of your noggin in at least some small, measurable way.

Ah-DUR-HUR-HUR. ...that is what you sound like. Like the wrong end of a gassy baby. And no, you are not even halfway this cute as you do it.
In fact, the prospect that you are typing these horrific, malformed lumps of language voluntarily and consciously is the only method I have left to cope with their existence. If I were, at any time, to believe that you truly thought that we should put our coats on hangars before we walked through the hanger, I would not only have to remove you as a Facebook friend but likely remove you from existence as well.
The F#*@ did you just say to me?
In the meantime, however, as I sip (shaking with caffeine or anger, I'm not quite sure) at my venti dark roast, pausing occasionally to type my next sentence or drop my heavy head into my shaking, defeated hands...
Wake me up when they're too old and brittle to use a keyboard.
...I will leave you with this. "Disorientated" is not the way you feel when you're confused or lost in the car. You are "disoriented". "Disorientated" means affecting this state on another person. It is a state which can be achieved by certain activities such as spinning a person around to disorientate them, which would thereby cause them to be disoriented.

Or, you know, maybe by slamming their heads into a wall a few times and then beating them senseless with a dictionary. That can disorientate a person too. 

...you know, so I've heard.




Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Life on a Budget # 1: The Grocery Store

I will be the first one to admit, I took a couple of days off over the Christmas break. ...okay, so I took almost three weeks off. But to be honest, I think I deserved it: it was my first Xmas break lasting longer than 5 days since pre-provincial team basketball circa 2000. Competitive basketball has been great, but it has also been very hard on me: I wish I could say it was a rare occurrence to fly home to Alberta on the 22nd and back to BC on Boxing Day morning, but it wasn't -- in fact, it was commonplace. And so, this year, I decided to spend as much time at home as I could -- 15 days, in fact -- and to spend the majority of it relaxing at home, helping my mom cook her amazing holiday dinners, and generally helping her out while also adding in a healthy dash of free time for myself.

Reindeer love carrots, and will wait patiently for them under the kitchen island for the entirety of the cooking process.

We gave Santa the option of cookies or a rawhide chew stick. Santa chose both.

But now, finally, blissfully, (painfully) things are getting back to normal. Gone is the hip-high prairie snow, the heated tile floor, the copious amounts of space, the tail-wagging, toe-licking foot warmer snuffling affectionately at my ankles; replacing them are hardwood, an unmade bed, pre-semester reading assignments, and (most importantly, and also most devastatingly) cooking for myself. On top of that, not only do I have to reacquaint myself with the process, but I have to purchase the necessary component parts -- and, try though he might to convince me, boyfriend's claim that frozen pizza and smoothie ingredients do a full refrigerator make is neither realistic nor palatable. Thus, a-shopping I must go.

And here, I stumble into yet another problem (oh joy! ...the sarcastic kind, not the awesome Christmas kind). After blowing a considerable amount of dough buying (albeit really super awesome!) Xmas gifts for my friends and family, I'm a little strapped for cash all of a sudden. I need money for edible, not gift-able, things, and it's sadly reawakened me to the fact that a grocery store (of all things!) can be a treacherous place for a spendthrift. 

My biggest problem? I like food -- the good kind. I'm not a glutton (I think...) but given the choice between fresh olives and canned, herbed goat cheese and Kraft powdered parmesan, and extra lean ground beef and the pink-and-grey marbled kind, I will choose the former 99% of the time (and the other 1% is usually if I know I'm just giving the finished dish away. But even then, pride usually wins out and I buy the good stuff anyways). Tack onto that the fact that boyfriend and I (boyfriend more by association) are pointedly healthy eaters, and navigating the enormous yellow aisles becomes even more terrifying than before (why is everybody pushing me?!). I have, however, over time -- and a great deal of coaching from dear mother -- managed to eke out a few standard rules that make life behind the squeaking grocery cart just that little bit easier (and cheaper!) to handle. And so, without further ado:

How to Shop at the Grocery Store with a Budget (and not Leave with 300 packages of Ramen Noodles)

1) Avoid processed foods. 

At first glance, those boxes of frozen gush look both simple and cheap ($3.00 apiece! Oh, boy!) but there are a few important things people rarely take into account: namely, size, quality, and packaging. Quality pretty much goes without question -- there's a reason those pictures on the front look so bloody appetizing, because these people know perfectly well you would never buy their product if they showed what it actually looked like inside.

This is the box.

This is why I'm no longer hungry.
And then there's the portion size. Yes, it says it's only 300 calories for creamy pasta, but there's a reason: the box is only about 2/3 full of food, and another 1/4 of that is made up of black plastic packaging. And even though it seems cheap, it's actually less so than you think: nearly 40% of that cost is based on the pretty picture and the square package, so you're really just paying for cardboard (and I don't just mean the guck they expect you to eat).

2) Not all meat is created equal. 

Yes, I will admit it: I prefer chicken breast to thigh, I like my ground beef extra lean, and I never buy meat pre-seasoned. But beyond that, there's something I do that few people seem to think about: I buy the cheapest package (but only of the best stuff).

Let me explain. A single package of chicken breasts is usually in the range of $14 per kilogram, and that's about six chicken breasts worth (which I usually buy in one go, then freeze individually). But within these packages, the individual prices can range from as low as $11 to as high as $17 -- but each box only contains six breasts. So which one do I buy? Why, the cheap one of course. Think of it like free portion control: chicken breasts are hefty pieces of meat. You only ever eat one chicken breast in one go, so why not buy one that's a measly 50g smaller in weight than the other? Not only are you saving calories, you're saving cost (and meat tends to add up fast).

Next, don't fall for the "I'll carve it myself and it'll be cheaper" crock. I did once, accidentally: I found a box of chicken breasts for nearly 2/3 of the price of the others, didn't look carefully enough at it, and took it home -- only to discover that it was bone-in. Oh, no matter, I thought: it's still cheaper, I'll just cut the bones out. And so I tried that. And I failed miserably. In fact, I failed so badly, that by the end of the process I had to pan-fry chicken pieces instead of baking the breasts like I wanted because I'd hacked them up so badly. And, on top of that (duh) when the bones were cleared out, they made up about 20% of my chicken -- weight that was still included in my price. Two lessons learned that day: 1), there is a reason butchers are certified professionals; and 2), there's a reason bone-in skin-on meat is cheaper: because you're paying for the weight of all the crap you won't eat, which means that all the different kinds of chicken breast are essentially the same price-per-weight.

3) Know your seasons.

My mom and I went grocery shopping while I was home for Christmas, and decided to pick up some fruit for dessert. Pineapples were on special (one of my favourites) and were also very good quality, because winter time is pineapple season. When we went to look at strawberries, however, we were shocked: where the average box of red, juicy berries averages $3 or so, these were priced at $8.99. Why? Strawberries are not in season, and so the cost of growing them is much higher (not to mention the quality goes way down). Google fruit and vegetable seasons to know when foods are both tastiest and cheapest, and make a point of having a wide variety of recipes so you can easily use whatever is most readily available (and affordable).

4) Finally, never shop unprepared (or hungry).

Studies have shown that the hungrier a grocery shopper is, the less likely he or she will be able to resist temptations for sweets, processed foods, and extra items. As well, bringing a list (and a snack) means that you rarely make impulse purchases, and less food gets wasted.

Even if you aren't 100% sure of what you are cooking for the whole week, try to plan at least 3 days' worth of meals and just shop more frequently. The fresher you buy your food, the better it will taste, and the less time it spends in your fridge or on your counter then the less likely you'll be to forget about it, let it go bad, and essentially throw (stinky) money down the drain.

Thursday, December 2, 2010

It's a Me Thing #2: I Like to Write.

First things first: I sincerely apologize for the week and a half's delay in posting. Between three term papers, two other blog posts (the ones I have to do, you know, cuz they hired me for that), a nasty head cold, a flu-afflicted boyfriend and an infection in both eyes (frigging heinous) I just had a little too much on my plate to get my write on. That is, with anything that didn't either count for 30% of my grade or involve me painstakingly linking stats pages to a weekly recap. 


But, back to school: I started the Fall semester with a very positive outlook. Aside from one mandatory course I needed for my major (which I was already well-aware would be exceedingly dry), I had free reign to pick as many courses as I could handle, from any discipline (as long as I had prerequisites for them), and at any time of day. Not only was my schedule no longer mandated by basketball practice, but (aside from the single course) I was free of departmental influence as well. I was free! Completely free! ...within the bounds of undergraduate course selection, of course. But, still! I was free!


I logged on to select my courses with the enthusiasm of a child stumbling upon the legendary hidden-post-Halloween-candy-stash.


Because there's enough candy for the two of us. Like, seriously, mom's been holding out.


I decided I would take a creative writing course, another English course about phantasmagoria and the subjective supernatural (I know. I squeaked with joy too.), a women's studies course (that not only looked semi-interesting, but was based for the most part on a 20% participation grade and had no final exam) and a communications course about journalism and media influence.

I think I remember physically clapping with glee when I went to sign on for my courses. Like, actually clapping at the computer screen. I was that excited. I looked like this:

UNICORNS and BUTTERFLIES and PUPPIES and GENUINELY INTERESTING READING LISTS! <3 !!XX! !!!


By the time I finally finished registering, however, my entire outlook had changed. I slammed my laptop closed (as angrily as I could manage without damaging it -- I was pissed off, not dumb) and flopped in disconsolate fury on the couch. When boyfriend finally convinced me to look up and talk to him, I looked like this:


Bring me a Men's Health magazine and a jug of wine or I'll go all apocalyptic rage up in here.


And it only got worse as school went on. Not only could I not take my creative writing course (due to a number of extenuating circumstances... for the NINTH SEMESTER IN A ROW), but the cool English class I desperately wanted to get into was closed, the English class I had to take had me grading fellow students' papers every week, the communications class (surprise!) really DID have a final exam, and my women's studies professor was not only a complete racist but also entirely unintelligible. (We watched one "fill-um" every day of class.) To say the least, I was livid.

And that was why, after signing up for what appeared to be a devastatingly hard English class centered around the diagnostic discrepancies of schizophrenia and critiquing the theories of Steven Hawking, I was ecstatic to learn that not only was this actually a cool class, but my old, eclectic and adorable professor loved my writing and displayed his affections in my grades. So, yeah. A whole load of crap, but at least I had one cool class with a sweet professor. The one ray of light to my dark existence... *melodramatic tear*

And so, for your viewing pleasure (and yes, I'll admit, to brag) I'll show you the two most recent papers I wrote for him. They both came back with A+'s (yes, that was the bragging part. I'm a little bit sorry) and I hope you like them as well.

The first paper was assignment that required us to critique a theory of Steven Hawking's from his book "A Brief History of Time", and I chose his "arrow of time" theory. In a nutshell, Hawking believed that as time moved forward (the thermodynamic arrow), the universe was expanding like a big elastic band. Eventually, he theorized, the band would stretch to its limit and then would contract again -- and this would manifest itself as the thermodynamic arrow going backwards, or time reversing itself. Thus, when we saw things start to place themselves in order again (for example, a broken cup putting itself back together, or heat energy humans have released re-forming into food) then we would know the universe was ending. He since modified this theory, however: he now believes that instead of going backwards or contracting, the elastic band will snap; that is, the universe will expand and disorder so much that food (ordered energy), for example, would dissolve into particles (disordered energy) before we could even eat it, as would everything else in the world. Eventually, everything -- even people -- would become too disordered to survive, and the universe would essentially dissipate like oil emulsifying in water.

The second paper was a comparative essay about motor neuron disease (Lou Gehrig's disease, the same as Stephen Hawking has) and schizophrenia. Motor neuron disease is a progressive affliction that causes the connections in the motor neurons in the body -- the ones that control movement and muscle impulses -- to break down. Eventually, a person can no longer transfer signals to their body to perform simple tasks like breathing and blinking, and this is how patients die (even though the brain is perfectly intact). In the case of a schizophrenic, symptoms include things like bipolar episodes, delusions, extreme manic or paranoid behaviour, and irrationality. The symptoms of motor neuron disease -- things like twitching, fasciculation, lack of bowel and urinary control, and drooling can all be treated with medication, but the disease is curable. By comparison, schizophrenia can be effectively 'cured' via a combination of intense drug therapy and psychological stabilization practices like cognitive behavioural therapy, although this 'cure' only lasts if the patient continues to take drugs.


Both my essays were written as narratives, as we were given a lot more free reign to explore creative styles in this class (part of the reason I loved it). The Steven Hawking theory paper is first, and the schizophrenia and motor neuron disease paper is second.


Enjoy! 




It's All Coming Back to Me Now: Narrative Exploration of Steven Hawking's "Arrow of TIme" Theory




Today was the day I finally realized that the universe was coming to an end.
It had been subtle, at first: broken objects reappearing, intact and unmarked, in their original places; groceries I’d already eaten sneaking unseen back into the fridge; a subtle sense that tomorrow was already stroking my memory though today had still not yet begun.  I awoke, some mornings, rolled out of bed, and padded sleepily to the bathroom, only to return and discover the bed in perfect order – hospital corners and all – and the pyjamas I had been wearing only seconds ago hanging neatly over the chair instead of off of my own bony shoulders (replaced instead by a clean-and-unworn version of yesterday’s navy cotton suit). Morning arrived at times I was sure it should have been night, and when I began preparing myself for sleep I was often shocked to discover a blinding blade of polished dawn slicing instead across the wooden floor. It was clear, now, to me: the continuous expansion, the exponential growth of disarray and disorder, was finally reversing itself. Time was going backwards: the thermodynamic arrow had been reversed, and we were a- (de-?) -ccelerating rapidly with it. The world had been stretched to its ultimate limit and was now retreating back to center like an enormous elastic band – it was a colossal clam, one of near-omnipotent proportions, pressing shut its gaping Kraken maw to squeeze the grainy world back once again into a perfect polished pearl.
The thing was, though, that despite this – despite clear and obvious evidence of universal de- (re-?) –cay – nobody believed me. Even the scientist himself was expunging it from his records: “At first, I believed”; “I thought that”; “I was misled”; “I realized that I had made a mistake” (Hawking 154). But didn’t he know that even this was a reversal? He was going back on his previous truths, slithering and retracting them back inside himself like the spindly, crackling appendages of some enormous modulating insect. How would he feel, then, when the limp, flaccid neurons surged erect with a new- (old-?) –found rush of synaptic pulses, when his gnarled fingers straightened and unfurled once more, and he peeled himself like a band-aid from the mobile prison of that confounded chair? He would have something to say then, wouldn’t he? Ha! They would all know I was right after that.
But no, they said; no, no. Time would not reverse itself; everything would just become more disordered, more warped and explosive until it all dissolved into an unliveable state of confounded buggery. Food, they said, would cease to transfer useable energy; air would clump into mucous globs and become unbreathable; vines would pierce unwilling brick like parasites and slither their way through the foundations like some malicious, serpentine cancer. Nothing would be in order, nothing would be functional – everything would be broken and mutilated and not-quite-dead, and we would each burst, then, in our own turn, into simple particles as well.
But they didn’t think I’d tried that already? Ha! The fools! Of course I’d tested their theory; what did they think I was, ignorant? I’d taken objects from all about the house and hid them in the strangest of places: a pair of underwear in the freezer, a bag of apples in the washing machine, a tiny row of shot glasses sideways and upside down trailing from the bathtub, around the toilet, and left through the bathroom door. I’d smashed eggs in gleaming ejaculations down the driveway and put icing sugar instead of coffee grounds in the filmy snakeskin paper liners of the machine. I’d even ripped holes in my clothing in inappropriate (perhaps obscene) locations, and then plucked voraciously the white, mothy hairs of my eyebrows till naught was left but the naked planes of skin.
Et voilá! The underwear, folded and pleasantly lukewarm, snuggled tightly in the drawer with its brethren; the apples, un- (re-?) -touched and un- (re-?) –marked, in the large glass bowl on the table (also un- (re-?) -marred, though I’d smashed it just Monday). And here! The shot glasses sat guiltily straight-lined in the cupboard; the bulbous eggs, still pregnant with infertility, clustered in their familiar docks in the refrigerator; and a steaming pot of (black!) coffee to drink with my new- (old-?) –ly re- (de-?) –stored corduroy slacks. But still, even then, the sticky strokes of condescending eyes caressed my face. I was not mad! I was prophetic! But still they refused to believe me. Till the very end, to the very moment, they refused to admit that I was correct. And so, with growing anger, I retreated; and my forehead pursed and puckered, buckling under the weight of my still-enormous eyebrows as though two white wooly caterpillars were fighting fiercely over the small patch of real estate that remained above the arcing bridge of my nose.
For months, I grew steadily younger and younger, but still they would not believe me. I grew muscles, then lost them; my skin burst forth with new (old?) dark hair, then shed it like the molt of some animal; and I shrank, steadily at first, then faster and faster until I was so small I could no longer lift myself from the bed. I thrust my infantile fists, mewling with derision, at each of their faces in turn, but still they ignored my protests: their sharp, angular faces, spitting forth those twitching, percussive sounds of their speech, never once wavered with recognition, even as my own truths grew inside of me at a morbid rate of inversion to my corresponding physical diminution.  They fed me spoonfuls of newborn mush, the fetid scent of it assaulting my nostrils as I swallowed, and swaddled me in cotton into which I both spitefully and involuntarily released the contents of my juvenile bowels.  My teeth escaped the sanctity of my mouth, waved once from their newfound freedom, and were gone; my movements, once ripe with the coordinated fluidity of experience, were first floppy and uncontrollable, then barely noticeable at all. My eyes, once sharp and clear, refused to focus – and so, for the most part I kept them closed, as it hurt me too much in my head and my heart to force them open and look about.
I tried, for the final time I think now, to explain – to stroke the blurred face of an indistinct caretaker and persuade them, earnestly, pleadingly, to hear me out – but my mouth could no longer make sense of the words, my hand could not lift its own weight from the bed, and my eyes sadly refused my request to see. It was in the final stages, by now, and there was nothing either one of us could do about it. The sounds of the world blurred into one cacophony of noise, then fell strangely silent as though muffled through cloth. I felt them, for one last time, swaddle me tightly, hold me close, and release upon my unresponsive face their quiet tears – or perhaps they were mine, I did not know – in what I knew was a final goodbye. And yet, still, resentment filled me – you didn’t listen, I wanted to scream, to fight and kick and bite and cry out – but I could not move, I could not see, I had barely enough left in me to pretend. And so, I resigned myself – relaxed my clenched fists and breathed out my last – before the world closed up around me and I was lowered affectionately back, once and for all, into the cave of the cocooning black womb from whence my larval form had come.

If they’d caught it in the early stages, the crowd whispered, he could have had more time. It was obvious, years ago, what was happening, but only to a mind trained to see the signs. How could the family have possibly seen it, when they didn’t even know what they were looking for? And even then, they couldn’t have stopped it – only slowed down its progress a little. Still, it seems best this way, they said – poor man was barely lucid near the end.
He was breaking things for no reason – smashing them against the floor and whatnot – and wreaking havoc all over the house. That poor girl was suffering enough, what with her father starting to forget her first name even, and then on top of it having to replace broken crockery, restore ruined groceries, reinstate pilfered artifacts, even feed and diaper him in the last few months. Poor thing never complained though, they sighed sympathetically, even when he screamed at her. They say she barely recognized him anymore, by that point – which was almost better, you see, as by then he was so far gone that he couldn’t remember who she was anyways.
Lovely service, though, they murmured, as the creaking casket was slowly lowered into the willing earth. He’s in a better place now, dear, they consoled, as one by one they pressed themselves against her, hungry animals tasting the sweet aroma of her sadness. They pressed her, gently, eyes raking the back of her charcoal gown in the fluttering autumn wind. She nodded, every time; clutched a hand here or there, accepted a hug or cold kiss of required sympathy, and retreated farther inside herself each time. He always said the universe was ending, she thought, as the last of the mourners ghosted silently from the cemetery, and the dirt began to fall upon the creaking coffin. He told me, every day – the world was ending, he cried out, and not a damned one of any of them believed him. The hot stripes of tears carved pathways down the solemn lines of her face. Well, I believed him. I always believed him. The hole was filling rapidly; she turned away. He was right all along, she thought, at last, as she turned her back on him for the final time; and as she walked, she watched with resigned solemnity the hem of her somber dress begin to dissolve and dissipate like weeping smoke against her legs in the approaching dusk.


The Half That is Broken: Narrative Comparison of Schizophrenia and Motor Neuron Disease

There are many things that I do that I don’t really mean to do; there are many things that happen to me, about me, near me, that really aren’t my fault. Things break, things cry, things bleed, things scream; sometimes I am one of those things, sometimes I am not. It’s involuntary, I tell them – that fancy, clinical word that means ‘I didn’t really do what I did’ – but they just roll their bulbous noggins back and forth on those white-collared, chicken-fleshed rubber necks of theirs and feed me more of their chalk-powder pills. 
 They say I walk like a stick insect, or a bolt of lightning – tall, jagged, twitching steps with my fingers drumming a rapid staccato against my thigh.  (Fasciculation, I say. Sexual frustration, they snarkily retort.) It never used to be that way; in fact, I had always considered myself to be a man of grace and fluidity, with the determined stride of he who knows exactly where he is going. I don’t ‘go’ places anymore, though: I stagger; I totter; on good days, I mince. And all the while, those cursed digits crackle a tempo of the sort of pace to which my now-discombobulated body can no longer manage to keep up.
It’s not just in my movements, though – the decay has even begun to manifest itself in my appearance. My hair, once suitably well groomed, now bursts in great tufts from every spot on my head it is not supposed to be: my ears, my nostrils, the tip of my nose, the creases where my eyelashes and my eyebrows meet. I awoke, one morning, to see it had spread across my chest and stomach to meet its wiry brethren beneath my waistband; and yet when I moved, it floated off of me in a great cloud of amber smoke and settled on the cold tile floor. I told the staff this, of course – my body was rejecting its own products! Surely this was cause for alarm! – but my panic elicited no higher response than condescension. You shouldn’t pull your hair out like that, they spat with their patronizing tongues, or soon you won’t have any left to pluck. In response, I swore fantastically and made a series of obscene gestures – conduct that merely landed me an additional dose of medication that made the room spin and my tongue turn to marshmallow. When I woke up, the air felt spongy, like moss, and my body stank of rot and antiseptic. My head ached like I had been smashing it against the floor. My temples were raw and stinging as if they’d been branded, and when I looked at them in the mirror, I had a pair of round, weeping pink marks that still buzzed with static remnants when I brought my spindly fingers up against them.
They give me nightmares, these ‘treatments’ of theirs. One night, I dreamt my skin had been stitched to the bed by a million tiny needles: I could see the blood seeping slowly, thick like syrup, from the fleshy seams and crystallizing like salt at the edges of the cloth. Just last week, I spent the majority of my twilight hours watching the muscles in my arms and legs move and slither and warble and hiss like snakes beneath my translucent skin; I awoke to the techs stabbing needles into my chest and rubbing salve into the bite marks on my wrists and ankles. I spent the witching hours, pre-dawn, and the rest of that morning strapped into thick, time-worn buckles with a leather bite guard locked around my drooling jaw, despite my muffled protests that it was only a dream, everything was all right now, and the restraints were an unnecessary excess.
They refuse to see the disconnection, though; it’s chicken-before-the-egg for them, they can’t see that their treatment causes my symptoms and not the reverse. I’m not mad, I’ve never been mad, I’m a perfectly capable human being – in a psychological sense, that is. I do need treatment, I do need medicine – but it’s for my body, not my mind.
The dexterity of youth has long since left my wobbling arachnid limbs, but so now has even the relative legerdemain of health. My legs, once functionally capable enough to carry me a few miles at least, now struggle with the simple task of propelling me from my stiff, cardboard cot and to the bathroom down the hall. My hands, once raising the delicate arousal of the tinkling piano keys, now spurt stiffly like stray hairs from my artless hands, hands that hang like meat hooks from the weakened wrists to which they are attached.
Even my most involuntary movements – breathing, swallowing, controlling my bowels – leave me heaving with the effort of their completion. There are days when I feel every inch the enormous infant, the carnival monstrosity of ‘boy who should be a man’ with a million mocking fingers pointed directly at my shamefaced, ginger brow. Just recently, I was stuttering my shoddy way across the room when I felt my guts churn and suddenly vacate themselves into my starched white hospital pants. Mortified, I stumbled to the bathroom and tried furiously to clean myself, only to be discovered by another patient who immediately ratted me out to the nurses. I was chastised like a naughty child – no, like a dog caught rolling in something filthy – then forced to soak in a fetid stew of my own soapy excrement, their lips curled with a brushstroke sneer, as they pretended blithely like it was possible to bathe away my gross indignity.
I’ve come to them, time and time again, with suggestions: benzodiazepines (for spasticity); protein supplements (for atrophy); anticholinergics (for salivating); alcohol (to help me forget). But, day, after day, they ignore me: chlorpromazine, perhenazine, haloperidol, they say. Our pills, our say, our final word. There will be inevitable symptoms, they tell me: rigidity, tremors, spasms, restlessness. (So, they admit, then, that their drugs cause my nightmares!) They roll big, cold, clinical terms around their mouths like ice cubes: drug-induced cumulative tardive dyskinesia; psychosocial cognitive stabilization. I shout my own back at them: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; progressive bulbar palsy; inconsiderate misdiagnoses!  I spit fire to combat their ice; but in the end, even fire cannot calm electricity.
I can feel my body failing from the outside in, stiffening like Dorothy’s Tin Man (oh Doctor, if you only had a heart!) until eventually I know I’ll collapse into a quivering pile of my malfunctioning component parts. A leg, there – he used to run with those, they’ll murmur. A hand, over there – they say he used to be a musician. And there – there, beneath the lumpy mass of corporeal muck – a brain, the only part of him yet glowing with the final glimmers of cognition.
And so, it has come to this, finally: me, or at least, the shaking, sallow subhuman that used to be me, curled like a larvae in my wheelchair, barely able to feign intelligence. In the corner, there, the tiny shadows of cobwebs in the dusk; on the table, next to me, the note I tried to write but could not grip the pen to do so. (It is crisscrossed with jagged scribbles, the final disgrace of which does not escape me.) And here, in front of me: the bed, the stark, sharp, mocking bed that must be made for me, now, each night: a true final resting place. With a great heave, I muster the last of my strength and roll pathetically forward onto the mattress. My arms, like dead fish, flop at odd angles behind my back; my face drops squarely between the pillow and folded blanket. My drooling mouth soaks the cotton; in a final retort, my bladder empties. But I can barely smell the sharp, sour stink of urine – there isn’t enough air with the way I’ve fallen, and that’s how I’ve planned it. My arms, once merely too weak to protest my abuse, are now so feeble that they cannot even turn me over and give me a deep, oxygenated breath of salvation. Ah, the wondrous bliss of the utter inability to change my mind. I taste cloth, then copper, then coldness. My fingers give one final twitch – voluntary or no, I no longer have the capacity to discern – and then finally, blissfully, peacefully, I feel my world dissolve to gray.

When they found him, he was facedown on the bed, his hands curled behind him as if surrendering to an arrest, the pilfered wheelchair guiltily overturned in the corner of the room. His face was completely blue, and he’d nearly managed to bite through his tongue – a mix of blood and urine had soaked nearly all the way through the mattress to the concrete floor beneath. A note, or what they assumed was a note, was crumpled in an angry ball on the nightstand; they couldn’t be sure, at first because it was smeared with feces and no one wanted to touch it, then finally because it was revealed to contain only a single word: “MISDIAGNOSIS”.
He was wrong, though, they told each other, as piece by piece the coroner extracted the torn cloth strips of uniform that he’d shoved one by one down his throat. It’s not surprising, really, that he committed suicide in the end – manual asphyxiation, though, how melodramatic! – but really, there was no need for it. Schizophrenia was a relatively manageable disease, if the treatment was undertaken properly; he’d just refused to take their direction. And so, in the end, an esophagus full of scrub pants, a tongue half-severed in anger, and yet another spray of human waste across the wall was his last, utterly undignified attempt to prove to all of them that they were wrong.
He was so simian, in the end, they admitted, grimacing over their coffee. Flinging poop, and screaming at mirrors, at biting at his own limbs; and even when he wasn’t managing to avoid the necessary doses of antipsychotics, all he did was complain about the side effects and chastise us for causing him pain.
He believed, they said – to the very end, in fact, he believed – that the body had been corrupted by the mind. And he was very nearly right: one component part of him had been broken, and it was causing malfunctions in the other. And yet, the body – the repugnant, corpulent, rotting, fleshy body – was not the problem, was in fact the only healthy part of him left; a smooth, fragile porcelain shell that finally burst and cracked beneath the weight of its rotten contents. From the very moment he’d arrived here, they told each other self-assuredly, from the very moment he’d stepped through the asylum doors, he’d insisted that the connections within him were out of order.  And they were; we must give him that much, mustn’t we? But much as he’d refused to admit it – as to the very end the man had refused to accept – it hadn’t been a healthy mind in a broken body that was the problem; no, it had been, till those final moments, in fact a tainted mind that first poisoned, and finally destroyed, the only physical self he had left.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Bitchin' Kitchen # 2: The Four B's of Cooking


Once upon a time, boyfriend had a bad day.

He woke up and he was still tired. His body ached and he was in a bad mood. He didn't want to go to school.

He made this face.


His eyes were half open and his breath tasted funny.

And no matter how long he showered or how much gel he put in it, his hair looked like this every time.


This made boyfriend angry. He stomped off to school in a foul mood, and as he did so, he looked like this.


Oh no, I thought. How will I make boyfriend happy again?


I wracked my brains all day.


 And by the time boyfriend came home, I had an idea; a wonderful, glorious idea.

Idea!

I would make him whatever dinner he wanted.


And so, when boyfriend walked in the door, looking like this: 



I said, boyfriend, I have a fabulous idea! I will make you some food!

And then he was like:



And I was like, boyfriend, why are you still sad? I can make you any food you want! I can even make you bacon! And I was like:

Everyone loves bacon.


And boyfriend was like:


And he said, not that bacon! This bacon!


Loads and loads of greasy, salty, delicious bacon!

And I was like, okay boyfriend. And I gave him a hug.



And I said, let's make you some bacon. And I did. And then we were like:


And the moral of the story is, on bad boyfriend days (also two more b's), there are four b's for cooking, and these four b's only: beef, bacon, beer, and bounty (i.e. lots of it). I have learned this through extensive personal experience, and this tactic has yet to fail me.

And so, today, when boyfriend had another bad day, I thought "I will make some 4B!" and I looked for the bacon. But we were out of bacon, and I didn't know what to do. And so, on a whim, I went searching -- and this is what I found.

This recipe is a modified version of the one found in the December issue of Men's Health magazine. It combines three of the four b's -- beer, beef, and bounty -- but I suppose adding crumbled bacon to it would be no big feat either. I have added some additional spices to this (as you will see below), but feel free to modify slightly to your (or your significant other) -'s tastes as well.



Guiness-Braised Short Ribs

For this recipe, you will need:

2 lb beef short ribs (they say bone removed in this recipe; personally, I prefer to leave the bone in, as (as any grandmother will tell you) bones are the basis of a delicious soup stock. Besides, if this dish is done properly, they fall out by themselves at the end and prevent the tedious process of trying to cut them out in the beginning and wasting meat).
salt and black pepper
1 Tbsp canola oil
2 cans or bottles Guinness Draught
2 cups low-sodium beef broth (I prefer low-sodium, but you don't have to)
3 large carrots, peeled and cut into large chunks
2 onions, petaled (this means cut the paper and the ends off and quarter them, then peel the sections apart so the pieces look like flower petals)
2 celery stalks, cut into large chunks
6-10 large mushrooms (I like shiitake or one large portobello cut into chunks. If you prefer white, though, this is alright too.)
2-4 bay leaves
4 Tbsp Worcestershire 
2 Tbsp Tabasco sauce, like Frank's Red Hot
parsley
chives
6 garlic cloves, plus 2 more crushed
one small bag baby potatoes
1/4 cup reduced fat margarine
1/4 cup low fat sour cream



Season the ribs on both sides with salt and pepper. 






Put the tablespoon of oil in the pan and turn the heat to high.



When the oil starts to run all over the pan, like this, then it is heated high enough to put the ribs down.


Lay the ribs flat in the pan. 

Cook for 4-5 mins each side, or until nicely browned.



Using a fork, transfer the ribs to a slow cooker.



Now, for those of you that don't have a slow cooker (and what they don't tell you in the magazine) is that you can mimic this exact process in a large soup pot. Just make sure it is approximately the same size as a slow cooker pot, perhaps bigger, with a lid. Instead of putting the slow cooker on high, turn the heat of your burner down to low and this will imitate the process. Just make sure to check the stove more often than you would a slow cooker, as it is less even and tends to be a bit more finicky (especially if you have an open-flame gas stovetop). 

While the pan is still hot, deglaze it by pouring in the beer and stirring it around with a spoon to pick up any brown bits. Pour the mixture over the ribs in the slow cooker.






Also, this was the moment I noticed a small plastic ball rattling around in each of the Guinness cans. Boyfriend told me it was called a Widget, and that all the dark beers used it to maintain freshness. I thought it was a toy, and was disappointed with this statement.


Why won't you come out and play with me?

Add the chopped vegetables, 6 garlic cloves (smash them with the flat side of a knife first), bay leaves, Worcestershire, Tabasco, and beef broth. Turn the slow cooker to high and set the timer for four hours.





Now, another thing they do not tell you in the recipe (and that you can really decide for yourself) -- the broth of this stew will be about as thick as it is when it comes out of the beer can. Personally, I prefer my sauces a little thicker, especially if I am pouring them over mashed potatoes. This is easily achieved through adding a heaping spoonful of corn starch and stirring it in. I don't recommend adding more than this, as the stew can start to taste powdery, but it will give it a slightly thicker consistency which I personally find much more appetizing.



Cover, and leave to cook.

In the last 45 mins before the cook time is up, cut the potatoes into large chunks and put them in a large saucepan or pot with just enough water to cover them completely. Boil them on high heat, stirring every few minutes, until they are soft enough to mash.


Into a bowl, add the sour cream, margarine, 2 cloves crushed garlic, and salt and pepper to taste. Pour the potatoes in and mash them (I like to use a thicker masher at the beginning to catch all the potatoes, then a smaller-faced one afterwards to make them nice and creamy).

Masher one
Masher two

Spoon the potatoes into separate bowls.



Using a slotted spoon, scoop the desired amount of meat and vegetables and place it on top (you will notice that the meat is now falling apart it is so soft. Perfect consistency). Use a regular spoon to drizzle the desired amount of sauce overtop. Garnish with parsley and chives to taste.


Perfect boyfriend pick-me-up.